On the occasion of UK Disability History Month 2024, LHSA contributed to a Lunch and Learn session with NHS Lothian’s Disabled Employee Network. Through the lens of our varied collections, we explored the role that disabled people have held historically in the workplace and the job market at large. This is the first of a series of blogs exploring the role of disability employment and livelihood.
Victorian Edinburgh. 1830s. A deaf man, Jonathan Kerr, is a cupper at the Royal Infirmary. But… what was a ‘cupper’? The position of ‘cupper’ at the Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh seems to have been first proposed by Mr Henry Mapleson in February 1826, at which point he also offered to take on the role himself. In Mr Mapleson’s words, the role ‘has for its object the local abstraction of blood by means of cupping […] requiring a considerable dexterity, and long experience’ (Letter of Application, February 1826).
On 25th January 1837 a complaint was made against Kerr by Dr Craigie – which seems to have involved Mr Kerr making a mistake in regards to some orders for bloodletting. In October 1838, Mr Cafe made a complaint against Kerr although the Minute Books do not record the reason for the complaint. The sequence of events takes us to the 28th January 1839, when Mr Kerr resigned as cupper and in February of that year, Mr Cafe would be the sole Cupper to RIE.
While there are three records of complaints made against Mr Kerr by different hospital staff, these don’t provide the later reader with much insight. The volume informs that there were difficulties communicating directions to Mr Kerr and that he made a mistake regarding some orders for bloodletting several years later. However, there is no mention of his deafness, which may or may have not been the cause of these misunderstandings and his eventual resignation, but which would have played an essential part in his role at the hospital. Although it is tempting to try to make assumptions about his working relationships and the challenges he faced daily, his colleagues’ difficulties in adjusting to his disability may or may have not led to his eventual resignation.
How do we know he was deaf you’re asking? Only because we received a query from a researcher who was tracking Mr Kerr’s story. His account highlights the many underlying issues around the acknowledgement of disability that already preceded Victorian society and have perpetuated up to this date.
No comments:
Post a Comment